From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-36107-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28794 invoked by alias); 20 May 2003 19:16:17 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28258 invoked by uid 71); 20 May 2003 19:16:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030520191601.28257.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with
 -O3 -fPIC on x86
Reply-To: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02195.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10877; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>,
   <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>, <lloyd@acm.jhu.edu>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with
 -O3 -fPIC on x86
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 14:10:17 -0500 (CDT)

 > I can reproduce it with `GNU assembler 2.11.93.0.2 20020207' tough so  
 > it looks like it binutils fault but it has already been fixed.
 
 So what do we do with this, then? Since we silently generate non-working 
 code, I'd prefer gcc work around the problem, but then I'm not in a 
 position to contribute anything reasonable to this aim...
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/