From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-36113-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8347 invoked by alias); 20 May 2003 19:36:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8292 invoked by uid 71); 20 May 2003 19:36:01 -0000
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030520193601.8291.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
Reply-To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02200.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/10877; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
Cc: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>,
   Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
   <lloyd@acm.jhu.edu>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 15:28:18 -0400

 The differences in the rtl shows up in testpic.cc.30.rnreg.
 The work around in this case is to run with -fno-rename-registers, but 
 this might not work in all cases.
 
 Thanks,
 Andrew Pinski