From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-36119-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9967 invoked by alias); 20 May 2003 21:16:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 7473 invoked by uid 71); 20 May 2003 21:16:00 -0000
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 21:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030520211600.7471.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
Subject: Re: optimization/8479: [new-ra] ICE in select_spill,
 at ra-colorize.c:1001
Reply-To: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02207.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR optimization/8479; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Volker Reichelt <reichelt@igpm.rwth-aachen.de>
To: bangerth@ices.utexas.edu, matz@suse.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
 gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: optimization/8479: [new-ra] ICE in select_spill,
 at ra-colorize.c:1001
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 23:12:34 +0200 (CEST)

 The bug is still present in 3.3 branch and mainline.
 A shorter testcase is the following:
 
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
 int bar();
 
 int foo()
 {
     long double x=0, y=0;
     x += bar();
     return x+y;
 }
 -----------------------------------------------------------------------
 
 Just compile with "gcc -fnew-ra -O -fPIC".
 
 Regards,
 Volker
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8479