From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10969 invoked by alias); 21 May 2003 02:16:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 10896 invoked by uid 71); 21 May 2003 02:16:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 02:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030521021601.10894.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: Richard Henderson Subject: Re: c/10826: [3.3/3.4 regression] Anonymous union regression Reply-To: Richard Henderson X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02224.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR c/10826; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Henderson To: Janis Johnson Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, bartoldeman@users.sourceforge.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: c/10826: [3.3/3.4 regression] Anonymous union regression Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:09:37 -0700 On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 06:35:22PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote: > It doesn't seem to be a regression after all, but a fix. Indeed it is. The sample code for this pr is not valid C++, and the GCC C extension mirrors the C++ feature. r~