From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-36136-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10969 invoked by alias); 21 May 2003 02:16:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10896 invoked by uid 71); 21 May 2003 02:16:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 02:16:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030521021601.10894.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: c/10826: [3.3/3.4 regression] Anonymous union regression
Reply-To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02224.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c/10826; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: Janis Johnson <janis187@us.ibm.com>
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org,
   bartoldeman@users.sourceforge.net, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/10826: [3.3/3.4 regression] Anonymous union regression
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 19:09:37 -0700

 On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 06:35:22PM -0700, Janis Johnson wrote:
 > It doesn't seem to be a regression after all, but a fix.
 
 Indeed it is.  The sample code for this pr is not valid C++,
 and the GCC C extension mirrors the C++ feature.
 
 
 r~