From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24974 invoked by alias); 21 May 2003 11:28:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21123 invoked by uid 71); 21 May 2003 11:26:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 11:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030521112601.21095.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Christian Ehrhardt" Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86 Reply-To: "Christian Ehrhardt" X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02285.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR optimization/10877; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Christian Ehrhardt" To: Eric Botcazou Cc: janis187@us.ibm.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, lloyd@acm.jhu.edu Subject: Re: optimization/10877: [3.3/3.4 regression] miscompilation with -O3 -fPIC on x86 Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:15:13 +0200 On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 10:42:30AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote: > Is it illegal for the pc_thunk to go into %eax instead of %ecx in that case? I don't know but there are apparently some gas/ld versions that make a mess of it (see the rest of this thread). Even if it is a gas Bug we may want to work around it. regards Christian -- THAT'S ALL FOLKS!