From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24885 invoked by alias); 21 May 2003 11:28:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21133 invoked by uid 71); 21 May 2003 11:26:01 -0000 Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 11:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20030521112601.21132.qmail@sources.redhat.com> To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, From: "Vic Abell" Subject: RE: other/9105: gcc-3.2.1/gcc/intl/Makefile gets incorrect INSTALL variable path Reply-To: "Vic Abell" X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02284.txt.bz2 List-Id: The following reply was made to PR other/9105; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Vic Abell" To: "Eric Botcazou" Cc: "'Christian Ehrhardt'" , , Subject: RE: other/9105: gcc-3.2.1/gcc/intl/Makefile gets incorrect INSTALL variable path Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 06:22:56 -0500 Erc, You write: > > I wrote: > > > > Yes. No difference. The INSTALL string in gcc/intl/Makefile > > is wrong if "/path/to/sources/configure" is relative; correct, > > if it is absolute. > > So everything works fine unless you build in the src directory, > doesn't it? No. It makes no difference if the configure step is run in-source or ex-source. If done ex-source with a relative path, the gcc/intl/Makefile's INSTALL string is missing one "../" component.