From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-prs-return-36198-listarch-gcc-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 8202 invoked by alias); 21 May 2003 11:36:01 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 8185 invoked by uid 71); 21 May 2003 11:36:01 -0000
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 11:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20030521113601.8184.qmail@sources.redhat.com>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
From: Jos van den Oever <jos@vandenoever.info>
Subject: Re: c++/10902: comparing doubles is not consistent in gcc 3.3 (SuSE version)
Reply-To: Jos van den Oever <jos@vandenoever.info>
X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg02286.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

The following reply was made to PR c++/10902; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jos van den Oever <jos@vandenoever.info>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10902: comparing doubles is not consistent in gcc 3.3 (SuSE version)
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:34:16 +0200

 Another addition to the report.
 Comparing doubles in c does work properly:
 
 #include <stdio.h>
 #include <float.h>
 
 int
 main() {
         double one = 1.0;
         double belowone = 1.0-DBL_EPSILON;
 
         if (one == belowone) {
                 printf("one == belowone\n");
         } else {
                 printf("one != belowone\n");
         }
 
         if (1.0 == 1.0 - DBL_EPSILON) {
                 printf("1.0 == 1.0 - DBL_EPSILON\n");
         } else {
                 printf("1.0 != 1.0 - DBL_EPSILON\n");
         }
         return 0;
 }
 
 gives output:
 
 one != belowone
 1.0 != 1.0 - DBL_EPSILON