public inbox for
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
Subject: Re: c/10826: [3.3/3.4 regression] Anonymous union regression
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 13:58:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)

Synopsis: [3.3/3.4 regression] Anonymous union regression

State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->closed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Wed May 21 13:56:20 2003
    Not a bug, but previously accepted erroneously. I now also
    see what rth meant: if you write "union type {...}" you
    really _declare_ a nested type. That explains why the
    compiler says that there is no such member. Only if you
    omit the type name, is this the declaration of an anonymous
    union, which not only declares a type, but also a "member
    variable" (in C++ speak).

             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-21 13:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-21 13:58 bangerth [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-21  2:16 Richard Henderson
2003-05-21  1:46 Janis Johnson
2003-05-16 20:39 bangerth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).