public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jos van den Oever <jos@vandenoever.info>
To: nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
Subject: Re: c++/10902: comparing doubles is not consistent in gcc 3.3 (SuSE version)
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 14:36:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030521143601.28103.qmail@sources.redhat.com> (raw)

The following reply was made to PR c++/10902; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jos van den Oever <jos@vandenoever.info>
To: bangerth@dealii.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org,
	nobody@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/10902: comparing doubles is not consistent in gcc 3.3 (SuSE version)
Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 16:35:15 +0200

 On Wednesday 21 May 2003 16:14, bangerth@dealii.org wrote:
 > Synopsis: comparing doubles is not consistent in gcc 3.3 (SuSE version)
 >
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: bangerth
 > State-Changed-When: Wed May 21 14:14:07 2003
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     I get the same result for 3.2.3, 3.3 (release) and 3.4
 >     (mainline):
 >
 >     g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/gcc-3.4-pre/bin/c++ x.cc
 >     g/x> ./a.out
 >     one != belowone
 >     double(1) != double(1) - DBL_EPSILON
 >
 >     Could you possibly try with the 3.3 release, not with the
 >     snapshot SuSE is shipping?
 
 I'm very glad to hear the bug is not present in the systems you tested.
 I'd like to install the released version of gcc 3.3, but as this is a 
 production system I'm working on, I prefer to install rpms from SuSE.
 I do have an old laptop at home, but it's not capable of compiling gcc in a 
 finite time.
 
 If there are any (SuSE or other reliable) rpms with gcc 3.3 I'm willing to 
 test.
 


             reply	other threads:[~2003-05-21 14:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-21 14:36 Jos van den Oever [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-21 14:56 Jos van den Oever
2003-05-21 14:46 Wolfgang Bangerth
2003-05-21 14:14 bangerth
2003-05-21 12:36 Jos van den Oever
2003-05-21 11:36 Jos van den Oever
2003-05-21 10:33 jos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030521143601.28103.qmail@sources.redhat.com \
    --to=jos@vandenoever.info \
    --cc=gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=nobody@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).