From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: c/4214: powerpc64: wrong code from optimized mask and shift
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2001 16:46:00 -0000
Message-id: <87bskrdeta.fsf@zip.com.au>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00044.html
List-Id: <gcc-prs.sourceware.org>

>Number:         4214
>Category:       c
>Synopsis:       powerpc64: wrong code from optimized mask and shift
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          wrong-code
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Sep 03 16:46:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     
>Release:        3.0
>Organization:
>Environment:
System: AIX panther 3 4 000785504C00
host: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.2.0
build: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.2.0
target: powerpc-ibm-aix4.3.2.0
configured with: ../gcc-3.0/configure 

>Description:
A certain mask and shift combination produces a wrong answer when
compiled with optimization.

>How-To-Repeat:
A program foo.c,

        int n = 3;

        int
        main (void)
        {
          printf ("%d\n", (n & 2) << 1);
          return 0;
        }

when compiled with

        gcc -O -maix64 -mpowerpc64 foo.c

and run just as "./a.out", prints 6 whereas I think it should print 4
(and which it does if compiled without the -O).

For what it's worth, it seems this only happens under "-maix64
-mpowerpc64", not in 32-bit mode.
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: