public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hallvard B Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: c/4378: too large constant should be an error
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E15kzTd-0004XZ-00@bombur.uio.no> (raw)

>Number:         4378
>Category:       c
>Synopsis:       too large constant should be an error
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          accepts-illegal
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Sep 22 20:06:01 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Hallvard B Furuseth
>Release:        3.0.1
>Organization:
University of Oslo
>Environment:
System: SunOS bombur.uio.no 5.8 Generic_108528-03 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10
Architecture: sun4

	
host: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
build: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
target: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
configured with: ../gcc-3.0.1/configure --prefix=/usit/bombur/hbf --program-suffix=3 --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-languages=c --quiet
>Description:
	A too large floating constant is a constraint violation of
	ANSI 3.1.3 (n869 6.4.4p2), but does not give an error even with
	-ansi -pedantic-errors.

	Unlike a too large integer constant, which does give error.
	OTOH, these do give a misleading error message with -pedantic-errors:
	"truncated to 64 bits".  This makes it look like the compilation
	does not fail.

	In any case, I fail to see why it makes sense to _not_ make
	this an error.  I'd think that any program which gets this
	warning gets compiled with incorrect data.  (Maybe except
	overflow into the sign bit only, if that can happen.
	Under -traditional, maybe?)

>How-To-Repeat:
	$ cat bug.c
double d = 9e999;
float  f = 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.9f;

	$ gcc -ansi -pedantic-errors -S bug.c
bug.c:1: warning: floating point number exceeds range of 'double'
bug.c:2: warning: floating point number exceeds range of 'float'
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


             reply	other threads:[~2001-09-22 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-22 20:06 Hallvard B Furuseth [this message]
2002-04-24 15:06 rth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E15kzTd-0004XZ-00@bombur.uio.no \
    --to=h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no \
    --cc=gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).