From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B699E385843A; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 03:39:58 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org B699E385843A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=ecsmtp.sh.intel.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ecsmtp.sh.intel.com X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10510"; a="369647780" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,210,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="369647780" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Oct 2022 20:39:57 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10510"; a="736661451" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,210,1661842800"; d="scan'208";a="736661451" Received: from shvmail03.sh.intel.com ([10.239.245.20]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Oct 2022 20:39:55 -0700 Received: from shliclel314.sh.intel.com (shliclel314.sh.intel.com [10.239.240.214]) by shvmail03.sh.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A295C10056A1; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:39:53 +0800 (CST) Received: from shliclel314.sh.intel.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shliclel314.sh.intel.com (8.15.2/8.12.8/MailSET/client) with ESMTP id 29P3drlb2145350; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:39:53 +0800 Received: (from haochenj@localhost) by shliclel314.sh.intel.com (8.15.2/8.12.8/MailSET/Submit) id 29P3drd42145348; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:39:53 +0800 From: "haochen.jiang" Message-Id: <202210250339.29P3drd42145348@shliclel314.sh.intel.com> Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 11:39:53 +0800 To: haochen.jiang@intel.com, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org, mliska@suse.cz Subject: [r13-3463 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64 User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Linux/x86_64, f751bf4c5d1aaa1aacfcbdec62881c5ea1175dfb is the first bad commit commit f751bf4c5d1aaa1aacfcbdec62881c5ea1175dfb Author: Martin Liska Date: Mon Oct 24 15:34:39 2022 +0200 x86: fix VENDOR_MAX enum value caused FAIL: gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c (test for excess errors) with GCC configured with ../../gcc/configure --prefix=/export/users/haochenj/src/gcc-bisect/master/master/r13-3463/usr --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl --enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap To reproduce: $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c --target_board='unix{-m32}'" $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c --target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'" $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c --target_board='unix{-m64}'" $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="i386.exp=gcc.target/i386/builtin_target.c --target_board='unix{-m64\ -march=cascadelake}'" (Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me at haochen dot jiang at intel.com)