From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.20]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F7623858C35 for ; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:29:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1F7623858C35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 1F7623858C35 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.20 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711034975; cv=none; b=wGSS53Af1Gjr41wHcr24ayT00qEQ8b0YA0zYc3bjTF4FnDUEfoau0UfPp5XEJw2imXE6ZFfowv+OZNMqNk6Glpfv0mXrioqzY6+labNTjShAj+I+qtcx/tJbQombx/37ufycBYFGwvDoiJjDMucgCKU23WwvLJzv7/8ZybVp/uU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711034975; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4sMi1z7K3piBpuRJn54Yu7MxRkJFooffypYK6uGihK0=; h=Date:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id:From; b=WHsvLHqPLL4JT93YrhBQblI53kWUnRLqmgL6blTNoR5eQ8qFiD6asAGUkYE5V3svwvS+APEtCxInq99whBloK3b+mhCeetmcrCNao68keH0plpdRju9QDALQKxgMufxR1Tp1q2Ll0kXhxHoYq7Jy51h1jR1Bdl/lhYTkktw01tY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11020"; a="5924325" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,143,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="5924325" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa112.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Mar 2024 08:29:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,143,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="14948573" Received: from scymds03.sc.intel.com ([10.148.94.166]) by orviesa006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Mar 2024 08:29:33 -0700 Received: from gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com (gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com [172.25.70.183]) by scymds03.sc.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0101C77; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC4CF12146F; Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:29:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2024 08:29:32 -0700 To: haochen.jiang@intel.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com, gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8473 vs commit r13-8469 on Linux/x86_64 User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20240321152932.EC4CF12146F@gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com> From: "H.J. Lu" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8473 vs commit r13-8469 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-8.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-9.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-10.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)