From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 472703858404 for ; Mon, 25 Mar 2024 06:04:10 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 472703858404 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 472703858404 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711346651; cv=none; b=KqSatjyqHd4fiV2mim3tRNM6N05H2F3Bk4HuLnv6Q65064MO69hcOwKBcGGvrLjxx8NSZmCkQvVvrA2ovhTeRRb94jQw4v4xxxK2bentMszummGCCPZR4WOves8kywdGlsp7WwL/Sle6NsLpxqubo0aK387IWNrcbYOZRMHhzyE= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711346651; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wqGdgDYk8/zPB7LpuQMlF8lYUQsB+XQwNW5izbWzuOs=; h=Date:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id:From; b=E2VZmXUR9OZ3oH2Gp2UjM0Vo99v44Jdun6vKpTNToqYD37dbV2EPEBbuvXT3CuBDCDqHPJ2L2/NOM47UP8l1+X3AmH6oy6FFWOjZWsywwptefxFR0t3SF7x76q9D8XT42KohMNzSk4AVgIsJxhxWwX5K5dGsbhJ3PumCc+AStIE= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11023"; a="10125765" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,152,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="10125765" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2024 23:04:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,152,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="19981583" Received: from scymds03.sc.intel.com ([10.148.94.166]) by fmviesa005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2024 23:04:09 -0700 Received: from gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com (gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com [172.25.70.185]) by scymds03.sc.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFFFB9; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 23:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0AB453E001E; Sun, 24 Mar 2024 23:04:09 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2024 23:04:09 -0700 To: haochen.jiang@intel.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com, gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Regressions on native/releases/gcc-12 at commit r12-10291 vs commit r12-10220 on Linux/x86_64 User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20240325060409.0AB453E001E@gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com> From: "H. J. Lu" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Regressions on native/releases/gcc-12 at commit r12-10291 vs commit r12-10220 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-10.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-8.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-9.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)