From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 392D43858D34 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:02:44 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 392D43858D34 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 392D43858D34 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711749774; cv=none; b=ATJ5NBbg9rmF1G/U7fzWA/RktX2z3lti1aOVbegkwtixDyJWcD5mTJQNRF70NSEBuoT94dq013MSHeMT1uZDQS+bJ7BOmS9b0VwSR6kc1nUrblsGLARoFVGaW3FQ6/YcCFFpPrmb2GQql8sf3EUtXkLr2yKkBKFfUZxoUahxdpU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1711749774; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2cDVbrscQAEaGLvKTw6JDSS4i9pm51rbuFmhCMMMx/Q=; h=Date:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id:From; b=EzIxm+jwFxtBKY28J5Y3u76zwDNDgoAhrCGm7buv4v2Zv6TlyyCop/we3gKtqcxlLFGD615rFv+F+M2fGQY/pLvQUfiG6lARkT8mCY//i0RCwXam7c/o4arIYR+H5Q+XaCDJZRVlGNE2AZvj5jXMlxanRucS4xRmmOM/t2SYC8w= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fLfRko5WQmWc2QBnnCIKlw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: IXVCocWwRTKn587t4LUgHw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11028"; a="7057673" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,166,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="7057673" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Mar 2024 15:02:37 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,166,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="21741583" Received: from scymds03.sc.intel.com ([10.148.94.166]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Mar 2024 15:02:36 -0700 Received: from gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com (gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com [172.25.70.183]) by scymds03.sc.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A79C7F; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3382312146F; Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 15:02:36 -0700 To: haochen.jiang@intel.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com, gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8504 vs commit r13-8502 on Linux/x86_64 User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20240329220236.3382312146F@gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com> From: "H.J. Lu" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8504 vs commit r13-8502 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) New passes: