From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5F0D3858C55 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 06:10:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B5F0D3858C55 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org B5F0D3858C55 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712124603; cv=none; b=sha1jBdEWeyLVZ9YFDn1ztNnMV0qyxVlhQtXbd0RsknMCMfoSxGTR5vg/JrOT9sLUnsrqe5xR5uHMd4VbVOm19QLX82pE6Gp1fJZFDZaPhxzX4pJlgu7fgfyETLwPIOHYzoXuSR8clWBbUWTPdojMG1/qy7llEipGe1188td1rM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712124603; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WlYN1hketT5ovchbamIR4eQbtmvnjrpiXOFKhwSvqGg=; h=Date:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id:From; b=MAX2HAZF65SV5IZ1X1XggxMKofAI6wSx1FDHXLowiVEXYJUTfIICIIRHtCzYPGAdbzRW5baLrM4mSUxWjxcrOOFoixNMlN0XxTlNhQUWFK+YmmcVetZ4iwL10rhwE2cOs7fYofDrZy6rE0t2xkItKPxbNmcwF1gpytGl+GdqlPA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: aGsSPsZTRMezNGyRWPXR+A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: q7VIh9mZSKOHVODnIapMKw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11032"; a="7523921" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,176,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="7523921" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Apr 2024 23:09:52 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: MIctXYGwTOqMXQoT+S/dYw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HKRjLMc5SeSxvYoN9r5HWQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,176,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="18286520" Received: from scymds04.sc.intel.com ([10.82.73.238]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Apr 2024 23:09:53 -0700 Received: from gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com (gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com [172.25.70.185]) by scymds04.sc.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D33200311A; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 658CD3E001E; Tue, 2 Apr 2024 23:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2024 23:09:52 -0700 To: haochen.jiang@intel.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com, gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8567 vs commit r13-8555 on Linux/x86_64 User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20240403060952.658CD3E001E@gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com> From: "H. J. Lu" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Regressions on native/releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8567 vs commit r13-8555 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)