From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.13]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81E853858C60 for ; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 18:14:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 81E853858C60 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu-skl-1.sc.intel.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=gnu-skl-1.sc.intel.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 81E853858C60 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.13 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712427263; cv=none; b=NZNojIboJh+FBIkju2JaLrqnFt1TseRusftOZO+wWoLKjfhGNqn20htZ37B8E2Zci8zQS9FilR0X8YelmLo1zeMdcAoh5fHLjkaWaOuxsKpa2bOGCtyts3uwYn4WGypLlo2GOKy1VJRAsx6hHkz3QFykneUoroM4v43AYVdqkCw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1712427263; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NdA5FuygLuhMKDszrEQxzvmPM3HmZVcF4+Ro7E86jc0=; h=Date:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id:From; b=lqgEhuL0cZBIbxfH1ztVKkX/XydL5XRfPoUSVJjVj6fkfwFpB84dasWndurfKCONmh/TXgzEDiKM3KcDz8giSaglViMX9tROJUpmTDTwxPgVEeorE3+DBN7W1SqdZ56M/PMkziEoUoeCw7tkPd164uYIlDi+0JS0+LwkKtwF9gk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: xObTus8vSh2BzbUSwivTqA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: H2OOPkGRR0yBzQ0oWMNEzw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11036"; a="18878741" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,183,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="18878741" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by orvoesa105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Apr 2024 11:14:15 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: rEfYT1gQQnKpGVPfQ5F6sw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 7Exp1KQ1SeSWB6CZbL3MXQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,183,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="56946708" Received: from scymds04.sc.intel.com ([10.82.73.238]) by orviesa001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Apr 2024 11:14:14 -0700 Received: from gnu-skl-1.sc.intel.com (gnu-skl-1.sc.intel.com [172.25.70.173]) by scymds04.sc.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EDE2003116; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 11:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gnu-skl-1.sc.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC7C53C3E31; Sat, 6 Apr 2024 11:14:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2024 11:14:14 -0700 To: haochen.jiang@intel.com, hjl.tools@gmail.com, gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8591 vs commit r13-8578 on Linux/x86_64 User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20240406181414.BC7C53C3E31@gnu-skl-1.sc.intel.com> From: "H.J. Lu" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8591 vs commit r13-8578 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) New passes: