From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EA3B384AB6B for ; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:04:16 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4EA3B384AB6B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 4EA3B384AB6B Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713765867; cv=none; b=IRguunv1BiMovIvWCzVUrIWjjLQ3lACGOq6tvbDQkru8cZplQwWbxaqwJXQPm1gC35SVHLGZImZR541Pj/P3u/cZbDhyICYa/dpJ88KuiSx8XI8TjKhDD8htOfctDhWXCIX+Ms6EkXx9GhAEpihJdG4jZCrXWWolYZAWDV2XrJQ= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713765867; c=relaxed/simple; bh=wgSuXlvg53KN5VCS4YviEQj3phrGR2e1R/+yrdvSyMI=; h=Date:To:Subject:Message-Id:From; b=reYkCFjtJ6D4iuaoMzEvshU+3POH6oxTLjS8VwLAJiC0BXQ+2PGwRSm19WTiJadLZFa/bqlL2o2lsWGnA3YWzMNFMfMN1qrkR2aubowxeWlsPa93d+qojESZHJ7RDNHqRjJ0DeGn/IOADJznmJuX9y6ADEFkVZdFvy2ZlLBoBU8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UNaCHI/PTRCYIFM9y9Qj/Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +TtbW0w6TRuny5jC33bLQg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11051"; a="9153632" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,219,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="9153632" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Apr 2024 23:04:16 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: NI69GKVpQP2dXNTnIUqutg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zNz5VaOFTBW5oJu8kcNB8g== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,219,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="23977076" Received: from scymds04.sc.intel.com ([10.82.73.238]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2024 23:04:15 -0700 Received: from gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com (gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com [172.25.70.185]) by scymds04.sc.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDAF2003BC8; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BA0403E001E; Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2024 23:04:14 -0700 To: gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com, haochen.jiang@intel.com Subject: Regressions on native/releases/gcc-12 at commit r12-10380 vs commit r12-10328 on Linux/x86_64 User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.24 Message-Id: <20240422060414.BA0403E001E@gnu-clx-1.sc.intel.com> From: "H. J. Lu" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Regressions on native/releases/gcc-12 at commit r12-10380 vs commit r12-10328 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-10.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-2.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-8.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) New passes: