From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.11]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464853858D38 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:58:47 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 464853858D38 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 464853858D38 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=198.175.65.11 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713833928; cv=none; b=JJzHt90HehjIADX0egiTeD6izSuB+T7LQV4NIjpiqxvQR+ClgJarljd6Zv3D5zt7xi5VtVEjpfW0BrxTz/a9Lbd4bvN9KM3IWJX6pbuaXp5Xm/VxpVpFo8Ji6njgBAiokPdDXDpBMSMYmN/gM7VqgpLIeAMb9SOhdjjSG+Itjcw= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713833928; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1IFkW/fWENYeUY2UU6sHYaubeEWTXONY6gveMv0KeNE=; h=Date:To:Subject:Message-Id:From; b=SHD8o5tiGHsecqjtXETYQUCh2Obhc8WXcW2PyrxJGFYLvATq1tEBLA/rlfDJxul1GXfncUOs6RFkPkzK+8BSbHY1ILQLM1YmjSuZfd4gbl6M+qcGgrHwQAsrz30DeaIKNKL9h87ks/YOP1l+wiaTWrUSu6LJF71XKtr2iinc8ls= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zEbrL3efSVufnOqaGSaZ/w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: m38KGajhSWq/KZZgstttAA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11052"; a="19952056" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="19952056" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Apr 2024 17:58:46 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: U5Z+7q1cRuOb0mT+jikWcQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bHc3VieqQ5mwqFsamw6bxg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,222,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="28865830" Received: from scymds04.sc.intel.com ([10.82.73.238]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Apr 2024 17:58:46 -0700 Received: from gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com (gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com [172.25.70.183]) by scymds04.sc.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3852003114; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 474011200AC; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:58:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:58:46 -0700 To: gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com, haochen.jiang@intel.com Subject: Regressions on releases/gcc-12 at commit r12-10380 vs commit r12-10328 on Linux/x86_64 User-Agent: s-nail v14.9.24 Message-Id: <20240423005846.474011200AC@gnu-ivb-1.sc.intel.com> From: "H.J. Lu" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_NXDOMAIN,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,NO_DNS_FOR_FROM,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Regressions on releases/gcc-12 at commit r12-10380 vs commit r12-10328 on Linux/x86_64 New failures: New passes: FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O -flto -save-temps FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-5.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-6.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-8.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-9.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)