From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A6963858412 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:39:45 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7A6963858412 Received: from mail-qv1-f70.google.com (mail-qv1-f70.google.com [209.85.219.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-16-xzHlsbx-P9CCKi8_TCLzpw-1; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 20:39:44 -0400 X-MC-Unique: xzHlsbx-P9CCKi8_TCLzpw-1 Received: by mail-qv1-f70.google.com with SMTP id q17-20020ad45491000000b003832299965bso6963147qvy.18 for ; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:39:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=c5szIzjC2azIEDR98DV5igtf75l2hqKuLdgRgVuiEds=; b=O6MukXi3EwO9oT8C4z3pbh+0bCyRCa0+vVj+qoHv0GiKawjlBoQgLcvR3TP8LSyTHU WiBEPVm6FhcRwZABvgIrMqYgd34hEHbbGaRA+9DXwixyOr2bXETeaFcQRZxE3iO/QEsN 9DEN7ptAhLKc31zHoYLTfsExiKLnhEX1Y2PM2Ku/4WeQNkrjbKXwI9nb1RV7w1TlBYcB /PyETJDSwxE2iCR/M+/IG4eKWj9Dd4MKVWm5+hskRtiR1RthfyLQb3HATPXOdBlQsnVG l1rkBpW4/vzO0mlXEQACqckJgMgNJTJl0bk+N8rJVyM8dK5f0lsHcPOM9/yiArjmRWlw ZZZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530lkKurpUh1EfM2/RDURj3p1J8STnn0OAL/PeNkavhedZEp7jhd FNEU8GmahGLfiHfE7mt4twPoLPxSjas+zvKzFXalr1Jxvb2VnR83w+UpUDk6dG3LaDm71UVtfxF uqZ5DttJoIN8ZbOzvQiNCOb/HHurzlUEAO6rXGFjnsCnjciX0hE5NOYb9Gbq1zYM5WVfuKqZrrg == X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7c53:: with SMTP id o19mr10634887qtv.228.1634258383442; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:39:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzOT8WLjoUA7VrJZtxy/LnRJPl+7sfm4ZgbjxX0zGT6XDAF7/kzbpU/53qCf1lq+BJFRr2qvw== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7c53:: with SMTP id o19mr10634861qtv.228.1634258383097; Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([192.24.49.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m68sm2041864qkb.105.2021.10.14.17.39.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Oct 2021 17:39:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [r12-4413 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr102738.c (test for excess errors) on Linux/x86_64 To: "sunil.k.pandey" , gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org References: <20211015001923.E2FC8286470F@gskx-2.sc.intel.com> From: Andrew MacLeod Message-ID: <59ab5113-26c0-4e1f-cf67-6909f1ea3543@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 20:39:37 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20211015001923.E2FC8286470F@gskx-2.sc.intel.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-CA X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, KAM_NUMSUBJECT, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-regression mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 00:39:46 -0000 On 10/14/21 8:19 PM, sunil.k.pandey wrote: > On Linux/x86_64, > > f0b7d4cc49ddb1c2c7474cc3f61e260aa93a96c0 is the first bad commit > commit f0b7d4cc49ddb1c2c7474cc3f61e260aa93a96c0 > Author: Andrew MacLeod > Date: Thu Oct 14 10:43:58 2021 -0400 > > Simplification for right shift. > > caused > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pr102738.c (test for excess errors) > > with GCC configured with > > ../../gcc/configure --prefix=/local/skpandey/gccwork/toolwork/gcc-bisect-master/master/r12-4413/usr --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-cet --without-isl --enable-libmpx x86_64-linux --disable-bootstrap > > To reproduce: > > $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/pr102738.c --target_board='unix{-m32}'" > $ cd {build_dir}/gcc && make check RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gcc.dg/pr102738.c --target_board='unix{-m32\ -march=cascadelake}'" > > (Please do not reply to this email, for question about this report, contact me at skpgkp2 at gmail dot com) > Is this due to lack of 128 bit support?   that fix has just been checked in and I think resolves it... Sorry Andrew