From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B413858C83 for ; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 07:44:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 26B413858C83 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1682149462; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=F9vPygomncHyUbmzuqNbZUpugwRqYfpaan2tjcuP+Ow=; b=LZtoQsv7h0/9KHI7EbUbGvvxwANzPx/Ot5smvfV7h0SsPcK2mopig3/Lg5GtR5MGC+o24J I3urpxhN85mHDrkSuxzdJp+aJk/upHQl6Ol8j8c4+PYDKC9UZ702mTbcILHVYHOlMZ4AQS V33UFJVQkgZ4LZ77pSXtTUTXQPJHGoM= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-27-gPh6HETWMOSmACjFZY-lEQ-1; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 03:44:21 -0400 X-MC-Unique: gPh6HETWMOSmACjFZY-lEQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B76FD3806720; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 07:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.194.25]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F0C1492C13; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 07:44:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 33M7iHeV2207135 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 22 Apr 2023 09:44:17 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 33M7iFiI2207134; Sat, 22 Apr 2023 09:44:15 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2023 09:44:15 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: "haochen.jiang" , Patrick Palka , Jonathan Wakely Cc: jason@redhat.com, gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, haochen.jiang@intel.com Subject: Re: [r14-159 Regression] FAIL: std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc execution test on Linux/x86_64 Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: <202304220330.33M3UOTu3169661@shliclel4214.sh.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <202304220330.33M3UOTu3169661@shliclel4214.sh.intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.9 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sat, Apr 22, 2023 at 11:30:24AM +0800, haochen.jiang via Gcc-patches wrote: > On Linux/x86_64, > > 03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e is the first bad commit > commit 03cebd304955a6b9c5607e09312d77f1307cc98e > Author: Jason Merrill > Date: Tue Apr 18 21:32:07 2023 -0400 > > c++: fix 'unsigned typedef-name' extension [PR108099] > > caused > > FAIL: std/ranges/iota/max_size_type.cc execution test That is mentioned in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-April/616439.html as known problem. I think the test should use std::make_signed instead of signed rep_t which it uses, but as Jason mentioned, it reveals further problems that need to be looked at. Jakub