public inbox for gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cohenarthur.dev" <cohenarthur.dev@gmail.com>
To: Philip Herron <philip.herron@embecosm.com>
Cc: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>,
	buildbot@builder.wildebeest.org, gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Buildbot failure in Wildebeest Builder on whole buildset
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2021 17:55:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210806155509.f4advlfv4zvdrr6k@oneshade> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b46b6ad-750d-96bf-6814-b0226aa4eaf6@embecosm.com>

On 21/08/06 03:31PM, Philip Herron wrote:
> On 04/08/2021 21:25, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 03:15:00PM +0000, buildbot@builder.wildebeest.org wrote:
> >> The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder gccrust-debian-arm64 while building gccrust.
> >> Full details are available at:
> >>     https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/#builders/58/builds/270
> >>
> >> Buildbot URL: https://builder.wildebeest.org/buildbot/
> >>
> >> Worker for this Build: debian-arm64
> >>
> >> Build Reason: <unknown>
> >> Blamelist: CohenArthur <arthur.cohen@epita.fr>
> >>
> >> BUILD FAILED: failed compile (failure)
> > This commit (and the following 3) were really bad. They didn't build.
> > Apparently bors doesn't check commit individually, but the buildbot
> > does build every commit separately.

Really sorry about this.

> > The tree is buildable again, but I think it would be good to not have
> > any commits that break the build.
> >
> > Periodically broken trees make it also hard to bisect issues.
> >
> > Is it possible to make bors check all commits in a series? Or can we
> > somehow connect the buildbot workers to the bors checks?

I think bors is mostly focused on having the latest commit on the main
branch always build, but I might be wrong on this. I think it should be
possible to integrate buildbot to the CI on github directly, side to
side with bors.

> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mark
> >
> Hi Mark,
>
> I think the build-bot checks for every commit is a really nice feature
> here. I think you should keep the build-bots as are. I really like to
> make sure each of my commits are build-able and pass tests. It keeps me
> honest to avoid regressions as best I can.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks
>
> --Phil
>

I'm really sorry about not having all the commits build. I tried to keep
them as atomic as possible and clearly didn't check all of them
separately. This could have been a single commit and would have avoided
this, but since each change was big I decided to split them up.

I was not aware that buildbot checks every commit separately. I think
this is a good feature, and I'll keep it in mind. Won't happen again!

Sorry again,

--
Arthur

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-06 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-04 15:15 buildbot
2021-08-04 20:25 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-08-06 14:31   ` Philip Herron
2021-08-06 15:55     ` cohenarthur.dev [this message]
2021-08-06 23:19       ` Mark Wielaard
2021-08-08 11:52       ` Philip Herron
2021-08-06 22:39     ` Mark Wielaard
2021-08-08 11:51       ` Philip Herron
2021-08-08 12:09         ` Mark Wielaard
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-03-22 12:41 buildbot
2022-03-22 13:08 ` Mark Wielaard
2022-03-22 13:09 ` Arthur Cohen
2022-03-07  9:49 buildbot
2022-03-07  9:57 ` Arthur Cohen
2022-03-07 14:23   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-03-07 14:32     ` Arthur Cohen
2022-03-07 14:42       ` Mark Wielaard
2022-03-08 14:32         ` Arthur Cohen
2022-03-06 22:01 buildbot
2022-03-06 22:20 ` Mark Wielaard
2022-03-06 22:33   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-03-07  8:54     ` Arthur Cohen
2022-03-01 19:08 buildbot
2022-03-01 23:15 ` Mark Wielaard
2022-03-02  7:21   ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-03-02  9:03     ` Philip Herron
2022-03-02  9:44       ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-03-02 10:05         ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-03-02 12:05           ` Arthur Cohen
2022-03-02 12:36             ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-03-02 13:31               ` Arthur Cohen
2022-03-02 10:00       ` Mark Wielaard
2022-02-23 11:48 buildbot
2022-02-23 10:26 buildbot
2022-02-23 10:35 ` Mark Wielaard
2022-02-23 11:26   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-02-23 23:19     ` Mark Wielaard
2022-02-18 12:11 buildbot
2022-02-18 12:48 ` dkm
2022-02-18 13:30   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-02-18 15:20     ` Thomas Fitzsimmons
2022-02-17 19:26 buildbot
2022-02-17 19:46 ` Marc
2022-02-17 21:05   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-02-17 22:03     ` Mark Wielaard
2022-02-05 16:58 buildbot
2022-02-05 17:12 ` Mark Wielaard
2022-01-29 16:20 buildbot
2022-01-29 20:23 ` Mark Wielaard
2022-01-24 12:29 buildbot
2022-01-24 12:37 ` Mark Wielaard
2022-01-24 21:30   ` Marc
2022-01-25  7:33     ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-01-25 22:42       ` Mark Wielaard
2022-01-29 20:20         ` Mark Wielaard
2022-02-03 20:55           ` Thomas Schwinge
2022-02-04 10:23             ` Mark Wielaard
2021-12-19 17:13 buildbot
2021-12-20 17:10 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-11-05 13:49 buildbot
2021-11-05 14:26 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-09-25 12:04 buildbot
2021-09-25 13:18 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-08-22 15:55 buildbot
2021-08-22 16:22 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-06-18 11:06 buildbot
2021-06-18 11:31 ` Mark Wielaard
2021-06-12 23:38 buildbot
2021-06-12 23:51 ` Mark Wielaard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210806155509.f4advlfv4zvdrr6k@oneshade \
    --to=cohenarthur.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=buildbot@builder.wildebeest.org \
    --cc=gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=philip.herron@embecosm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).