From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-vs1-xe29.google.com (mail-vs1-xe29.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e29]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE5123858010 for ; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 09:39:53 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org BE5123858010 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=embecosm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=embecosm.com Received: by mail-vs1-xe29.google.com with SMTP id t18so10506124vsr.12 for ; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 02:39:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=embecosm.com; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=0cjsi0YIdSY8FiNj2McEPP0Pvbm6Aw0bSv+XER0gbp0=; b=CRZ2ycNIa2qzKkPUyPYlQIHA9X2HJrQIqr+EOGmW3zlTb3TONg0wDMGfyMv5pTN+/A /e5IxrY71IT7QW+KumMPTIQ96b6pwduTeCLdab5r6JrCpPUTdXLeMkRjpPq83hBU8YYW m+s2MBdSXmcTN5HJ/662hhg14UdLHnGM2gy0LSkGS+Gs+c9olOEmF36dgKkpB8Xo5jEX LXRFt4YEEdR7WkGCH9eMJXmD371G9FMVBSkcMRyT7wkJQTX8Wya6Fg3e20O7wA6tZLFR dyBjycZ/sY+c2vsXAAtoQIMztbucnvlbV4oniiLThAw+/Uygz1lFkqktDfsJx6bE72gQ vrhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=0cjsi0YIdSY8FiNj2McEPP0Pvbm6Aw0bSv+XER0gbp0=; b=Gez8yjmg7is+cXcJv42hNCsQgZveh0WyxWyEhR2Sn+8SfXH8DzG2+UxOPxit2knU43 R5bJvDQWsMvqJqB2qg9o5SVW6/a0dO336xRcSzaosWHE5edVyf/o9eDDuh+PvEkTsQaR WTaZB9vutpSEFne3jDpBUa+e1ed0dsVbaHp4DU+DZC6iyqnXDuKyIKZsAHNosm4s1nzJ OQgzXrNwFlNylp/sHDQwBZMcf2P9HGRWZdbnw2aD6Tt5lN4qL50k1oKDqqjC6GoUQ7oY V25NnE/6Nl4t9v5KYBvVdecTUfMVbKrQpSuxvW2oxqPRUHb4locD8iYk2L8U9DZnVUpf ryag== X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2AcV69x11fmwAsByfFyOUZFjvA1yiHUxArsnZJ5PmePHdhh1hY GsB3UUJP1IvGBvjULTGWqkS78+fFms4f1dGDXgPyqA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM53uvuIFrqrUsxz9PG1kG5dp45VDT5NRq/rRBSdkvaGxfi4T0+crwtM4Jq4su/ctakvgp/xmpgvui/mN4PxzaQ= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f853:0:b0:3a6:6cb7:f705 with SMTP id b19-20020a67f853000000b003a66cb7f705mr6174120vsp.48.1664962793107; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 02:39:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <39865089adafe93d92571e6768bb911f9bc292a6.camel@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: From: Philip Herron Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 10:39:42 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Rust front-end To: Jakub Jelinek Cc: David Malcolm , gcc Mailing List , gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Jakub, Thanks for this, as I mentioned in my response to David we have made a table and use this link to try and see what's going on https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/20220824115956.737931-9-philip.herron@embecosm.com/T/#rbff0bb3df2780fecd9ee3d2baa864d9140d24b54 Do you think I should send a PING email to each patch which we are waiting on review for? Thanks --Phil On Tue, 4 Oct 2022 at 14:04, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 08:42:58AM -0400, David Malcolm via Gcc wrote: > > On Tue, 2022-10-04 at 13:29 +0100, Philip Herron wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > As the cut-off for merging is coming up in November, quite a few of > > > our patches have not been reviewed yet. > > > > > > There are a few main issues that have been raised so far, and we are > > > fixing those at the moment in preparation for version 3 of the > > > patches. Is there anything else we can do to make reviewing the rest > > > of the patches easier? > > > > Do you have a list of which patches need reviewing? > > e.g. perhaps a page showing: > > - which patches are waiting for a reviewer, as opposed to > > - which patches are already approved > > - which patches have issues identified in review > > - ...where no-one is yet working on addressing them > > - ...where someone is working on addressing them > > etc > > > > to make it clearer what the next action is for each patch, and who is > > meant to be taking it. > > > > (within Red Hat, we used to call this "who has the ball?") > > Yeah, our policy in https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html states that > "Pinging patches, Getting patches applied > > If you do not receive a response to a patch that you have submitted within > two weeks or so, it may be a good idea to chase it by sending a follow-up > e-mail to the same list(s). Patches can occasionally fall through the > cracks. Please be sure to include a brief summary of the patch and the URL > of the entry in the mailing list archive of the original submission." > > If some patches have been already reviewed, others partly, others in the > works and others need review, sending a mail with those details > so that it is easy to find out what is still pending is appreciated even > more. > > Jakub >