From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C9F39ADC1B for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 22:39:07 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 66C9F39ADC1B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from reform (deer0x03.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF2DD30291A9; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 00:39:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by reform (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 74E4B2E80640; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 00:39:05 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 00:39:05 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: Philip Herron Cc: gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Buildbot failure in Wildebeest Builder on whole buildset Message-ID: References: <20210804151500.BECFC81A9C8@builder.wildebeest.org> <8b46b6ad-750d-96bf-6814-b0226aa4eaf6@embecosm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8b46b6ad-750d-96bf-6814-b0226aa4eaf6@embecosm.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: gcc-rust mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 22:39:08 -0000 Hi Philip, On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 03:31:07PM +0100, Philip Herron wrote: > > Is it possible to make bors check all commits in a series? Or can we > > somehow connect the buildbot workers to the bors checks? > > I think the build-bot checks for every commit is a really nice feature > here. I think you should keep the build-bots as are. I really like to > make sure each of my commits are build-able and pass tests. It keeps me > honest to avoid regressions as best I can. > > What do you think? I am just a little afraid it is running too late. But I am pretty happy we have workers for 4 different architectures and they are green most of the time. We really should add a 32bit (i686 or armhf) one just to be sure that works correctly. Currently i686 gets lots of failures like: /home/mark/gccrs/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/torture/methods3.rs:27:5: error: type mismatch in binary exp ression f64 D.229 = _2 + _4; /home/mark/gccrs/gcc/testsuite/rust/compile/torture/methods3.rs:27:5: internal compiler error: 'verify_g imple' failed 0x8b41fd4 verify_gimple_in_seq(gimple*) ../../gccrs/gcc/tree-cfg.c:5157 0x884b4c3 gimplify_body(tree_node*, bool) ../../gccrs/gcc/gimplify.c:15401 0x884b692 gimplify_function_tree(tree_node*) ../../gccrs/gcc/gimplify.c:15472 0x86a6448 cgraph_node::analyze() ../../gccrs/gcc/cgraphunit.c:670 0x86a9218 analyze_functions ../../gccrs/gcc/cgraphunit.c:1236 0x86a9e01 symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit() ../../gccrs/gcc/cgraphunit.c:2514 Cheers, Mark