From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 045053854807 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 2021 23:19:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 045053854807 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from reform (deer0x03.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C40BF30291A9; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 01:19:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: by reform (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8C65B2E80FE3; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 01:19:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 01:19:22 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: "cohenarthur.dev" Cc: Philip Herron , gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Buildbot failure in Wildebeest Builder on whole buildset Message-ID: References: <20210804151500.BECFC81A9C8@builder.wildebeest.org> <8b46b6ad-750d-96bf-6814-b0226aa4eaf6@embecosm.com> <20210806155509.f4advlfv4zvdrr6k@oneshade> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210806155509.f4advlfv4zvdrr6k@oneshade> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: gcc-rust mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2021 23:19:27 -0000 Hi Arthur, On Fri, Aug 06, 2021 at 05:55:09PM +0200, cohenarthur.dev via Gcc-rust wrote: > I'm really sorry about not having all the commits build. I tried to keep > them as atomic as possible and clearly didn't check all of them > separately. This could have been a single commit and would have avoided > this, but since each change was big I decided to split them up. > > I was not aware that buildbot checks every commit separately. I think > this is a good feature, and I'll keep it in mind. Won't happen again! No worries, that is what the bots are for. We are all human, but the bots aren't :) It would be more helpful if the buildbot workers ran a bit earlier. Cheers, Mark