Hi,

On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 03:01:39AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
> > Sorry for lack of reply on this. After looking into this and also
> > getting Arthur Cohen to review, I think:
> > 
> >   * Token passing: If we end up using the token for more than the
> >     location this might be useful but at present I can't think of a
> >     use-case for the token. If we do need it maybe we could look into
> >     passing it by reference.
> >   * Location passing: I think this is the best solution and is directly
> >     associated with the issue you have fixed. The function says that you
> >     can call me but tell me the location as well so its up to the caller
> >     to handle this. We should add a comment to the function prototypes
> >     to say what the location is but that's it.
> > 
> > What do you think?
> 
> OK, lets go with the location passing. I added a comment to the
> function prototypes in rust-parse.h about the passed in
> pratt_parsed_token.
> 
> https://code.wildebeest.org/git/user/mjw/gccrs/commit/?h=pass-pratt-parse-token

Looks like I said I'll do B, then did A anyway... duh. Sorry.  Here is
the patch as I said I would do it, also on this branch, rebased
against upstream:
https://code.wildebeest.org/git/user/mjw/gccrs/commit/?h=pass-pratt-parse-loc

Cheers,

Mark