From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (wildebeest.demon.nl [212.238.236.112]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCAD23858C3A for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:25:22 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org CCAD23858C3A Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (83-87-18-245.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.87.18.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FC25300071F; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:25:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D537440007A5; Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:25:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove warnings from v0_mangle functions in rust-mangle.cc From: Mark Wielaard To: "cohenarthur.dev" Cc: gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 14:25:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20210921115802.wm7gkstjm7wouwst@oneshade> References: <20210920224956.147676-1-mark@klomp.org> <20210921115802.wm7gkstjm7wouwst@oneshade> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-10.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc-rust@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: gcc-rust mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 12:25:24 -0000 Hi Arthur, On Tue, 2021-09-21 at 13:58 +0200, cohenarthur.dev via Gcc-rust wrote: > I forgot to do a clean build before creating the pull request and the > file was already compiled... Sorry about that! >=20 > I'll keep on working on v0 mangling in order to get all the parts > linked correctly, but it was in a bit of a dire state :) Thanks for working on this. And no worries, I am just allergic to warnings (I just must look at them to make sure I understand what is going on and it wasn't me making a mistake). Cheers, Mark