From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-4324.protonmail.ch (mail-4324.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.24]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 270E63857B9B for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 04:06:37 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 270E63857B9B Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=protonmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=protonmail.com Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2023 04:06:24 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1686197195; x=1686456395; bh=mA0sSztIh0WFTm68CtcMs8MO+sccXsFLb+aRCup+QsE=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date: Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=TUY7brAg/jZY5w149nIb8s0x23E7gYQus5FrIFGooGvxJ85EzxxViUVvO/+55K9Jh N8xt5f9Srr5EzLeZB6qMzK60nRdYXEme6dNWf8O1mUBg+q4zjB83Se2QXkvINSulUD LLzQwV2KeWQYUO6b3XUrCVgjlQbsCgobpVVpeydDt7TQun9s7NCpuiU0gtLItshJkR knLLsz2uNyoR37foT0Fl2n0SEwlPeXFkKngHX2caIGdCOlcaVkypTh+e5LTMIDKmwG ux+O/veoBHoWxQZ6jgMBZssZ+7DKQbMQQnayVEzjBUPyCAAtccltfMTXpEPkD9StuQ yUMXpVsJYMVDw== To: "gcc@gcc.gnu.org" From: waffl3x Subject: Targetting p0847 for GCC14 (explicit object parameter) Message-ID: <-lagpkDt6u_VblqDUoD5HTrUzEXyAOM_73nW51wxSK0EjyVZjJRlSnQd_a5EgWoqf5xLOEY5k63w3aMGnKBYJcvLxnN5ReHLVpp5zl7cwSI=@protonmail.com> Feedback-ID: 14591686:user:proton MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: I would like to boldly suggest implementing P0847 should be targeted at GCC14. In my anecdotal experiences, this feature is very important to people, and very important to myself, I believe it should be a priority. I am not suggesting this without offering to contribute, however because of my inexperience with compiler hacking I am concerned I would hinder efforts. With that said, if no one is interested in starting work on it, but there is consensus that the feature is important enough, then I will do my best to take up that job. If this was already the understood plan for GCC14, I apologize for my ignorance on the matter. I searched around and couldn't find any information regarding it, the mail list didn't seem to have any results either. If it's there and I missed it, please do point it out. I am also wondering if there is a public document with information about the feature roadmap? I can understand why there isn't one if that isn't the case, I imagine it would just cause a nuisance for the developers. I had read the GCC Development Plan document a few months ago and given the information in it I decided to wait for development to move on to GCC14 before getting in touch. In hindsight that might have been a mistake, oops! I apologize if I overlooked something obvious, please don't hesitate to correct any misconceptions I'm having here as it's not my intention to step on any toes here, I just really really value this feature and want to see it sooner rather than later. I look forward to hearing everyone's input, -Alex