From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-42263-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 15485 invoked by alias); 5 Dec 2001 03:00:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15464 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2001 03:00:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hall.mail.mindspring.net) (207.69.200.60)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Dec 2001 03:00:32 -0000
Received: from sdn-ar-002watacop132.dialsprint.net ([206.133.235.196] helo=tcprincemobl)
	by hall.mail.mindspring.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 16BSIO-0001iP-00; Tue, 04 Dec 2001 22:00:29 -0500
Message-ID: <000101c17d38$fe510e10$c4eb85ce@amr.corp.intel.com>
From: "Tim Prince" <tprince@computer.org>
To: "Graham Stott" <grahams@redhat.com>,
	<mcuss@cdlsystems.com>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20011204153416.A24659@disaster.jaj.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112042032530.27017-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <20011204155032.A24992@disaster.jaj.com> <00d001c17d05$4be398c0$160e10ac@hades> <3C0D3A05.6FE3602F@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Assembly in Gcc
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2001 19:00:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2

Much as I dislike the MSVC style, this would be a valuable contribution.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Graham Stott" <grahams@redhat.com>
To: <mcuss@cdlsystems.com>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 1:03 PM
Subject: Re: Assembly in Gcc


> Mark,
>
> Mark Cuss wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I am new to doing inline asembly in gcc and have a few questions -
hopefully
> > someone can help me out.
> >
> > I read the section of the manual on the doing inline assembly.  It is
quite
> > different than the old Borland compiler I used to use on DOS - I could
just
> > put an "asm " and enclose all of my Intel syntax assmebly instructions
> > inside there.  Is there any way to do this in gcc?  I found the
intel_syntax
> > directive and passed that in, but it seems that I still need to put %' s
in
> > front of register names, etc.
> >
> You might like to try ".intel_syntax noprefix" that avoids the needs to
the %
> on register names.
>
> > The project I am working on involves integrating a large chunk (~ 40
pages)
> > of Intel assembly instructions into a program which I must compile with
gcc.
> > So, my goal is to be able to do something like this:
> >
> >     asm {
> >                 mov dx, 378
> >                 mov al, FF
> >                 out dx, al
> >         } ;
> >
> >  ... Without reformatting the code.  Is this possible?
> >
> Not as things currently stand you have to convert the asm { ... } form
into
> GCC's own asm construct.
>
> Now it just so happens that I'm working on adding support of MS style
inline
> assembler in to GCC for the x86. It's in an advanced state and almost
ready
> to be submitted.
>
> > Thanks in advance
> >
>
> > Mark
>
> Graham