From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-118524-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 21635 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2005 22:30:52 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 21627 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Aug 2005 22:30:47 -0000
Received: from smtp5.wanadoo.fr (HELO smtp5.wanadoo.fr) (193.252.22.26)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.30-dev) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:30:47 +0000
Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mwinf0507.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 83DE41C0162B
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:30:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from none (AOrleans-151-1-4-238.w83-115.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.115.114.238])
	by mwinf0507.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with SMTP id 2926E1C01627
	for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Tue, 23 Aug 2005 00:30:45 +0200 (CEST)
X-ME-UUID: 20050822223045168.2926E1C01627@mwinf0507.wanadoo.fr
Message-ID: <001101c5a768$d817c140$96cefea9@none>
From: "Christophe Jaillet" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
To: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Memory usage reduction in loop.c ?
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 22:39:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2005-08/txt/msg00605.txt.bz2

I think that the structure 'struct loop_info' in loop.c could be shrinked a
bit if all the 'int has_XXX' fields where turned into a bitfield just as in
'struct iv_class' or 'struct induction' in the same file.

I don't know if it worse it (in term of memory usage reduction) neither the
impact in performance.

If anyone interested, I can try it and do a bootstrap but I don't have the
tools to perform benchmark (memory usage or speed of the compiler)


Christophe Jaillet