Re: libstdc++ v3 & snapshots

Re: libstdc++ v3 & snapshots

[Mike Stump]

> From: Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey@innoverse.com>
> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2000 14:57:23 -0500
> To: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>

> 1. Is libstdc++ now the default in the latest snapshots?

Yes, that seems to be the intent.

> 2. What's the safest way of installing that will allow me to easily
> switch back to my 2.95.2 existing install?

mkdir /tmp/foo && configure --prefix=/tmp/fo && make bootstrap install

Re: libstdc++ v3 & snapshots

[Benjamin Scherrey]

OK - I just tried this on my ix86 RedHat 6.2 setup and it seemed to work but 
it turns out that the include files never made it. Is the install broken with 
you specify a different prefix?

	thanx & later,

		Ben Scherrey

On Tuesday 14 November 2000 15:14, Mike Stump wrote:
> > 2. What's the safest way of installing that will allow me to easily
> > switch back to my 2.95.2 existing install?
>
> mkdir /tmp/foo && configure --prefix=/tmp/fo && make bootstrap install

Re: libstdc++ v3 & snapshots

[Benjamin Scherrey]

ACK! Sorry - screwed up. Got it now. thanx.

On Tuesday 14 November 2000 19:30, Benjamin Scherrey wrote:
> OK - I just tried this on my ix86 RedHat 6.2 setup and it seemed to work
> but it turns out that the include files never made it. Is the install
> broken with you specify a different prefix?
>
> 	thanx & later,
>
> 		Ben Scherrey
>
> On Tuesday 14 November 2000 15:14, Mike Stump wrote:
> > > 2. What's the safest way of installing that will allow me to easily
> > > switch back to my 2.95.2 existing install?
> >
> > mkdir /tmp/foo && configure --prefix=/tmp/fo && make bootstrap install

libstdc++ v3 & snapshots

[Benjamin Scherrey]

	After several mixed-success attempts at getting 2.96 snapshots with the 
latest libstdc++ lib going I've held off a bit until this integration was 
cleaner. My last attempt was a month ago and it looks like a patch has been 
posted by Mark that now makes it the default since then. So I ask...

	1. Is libstdc++ now the default in the latest snapshots?
	2. What's the safest way of installing that will allow me to easily switch 
back to my 2.95.2 existing install? (I'm evolving existing code to be able to 
build under the eventual 3.0 release while still supporting the 2.95.2 
release.)
	3. Do I report libstdc++ issues here now or on another list?

	Great work & thanx,

		Ben Scherrey