* Samsung CalmRISC16 support [not found] <1095424330.1272.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org> @ 2004-09-17 13:04 ` Udo van den Heuvel 2004-09-17 13:22 ` Diego Novillo 2004-09-17 13:44 ` Steven Bosscher 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Udo van den Heuvel @ 2004-09-17 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc Hello, This is just a notice that at http://www.donat.org/archos/files/ you can download the GNU-Pro sources done by RedHat with Samsung CalmRISC16 support. Please consider incorporating the CalmRISC support to the current GCC. Thanks, Udo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support 2004-09-17 13:04 ` Samsung CalmRISC16 support Udo van den Heuvel @ 2004-09-17 13:22 ` Diego Novillo 2004-09-17 13:44 ` Steven Bosscher 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Diego Novillo @ 2004-09-17 13:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Udo van den Heuvel; +Cc: gcc On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 08:37, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: > Please consider incorporating the CalmRISC support to the current GCC. > Unfortunately, this is not how it works. If you want to contribute your port to GCC, please read http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html. Diego. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support 2004-09-17 13:04 ` Samsung CalmRISC16 support Udo van den Heuvel 2004-09-17 13:22 ` Diego Novillo @ 2004-09-17 13:44 ` Steven Bosscher 2004-09-17 13:46 ` Richard Earnshaw 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Steven Bosscher @ 2004-09-17 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Udo van den Heuvel; +Cc: gcc On Sep 17, 2004 02:37 PM, Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xs4all.nl> wrote: > Please consider incorporating the CalmRISC support to the current GCC. That would be up to someone who wants to contribute the port and take responsibility for maintaining it. Nobody will consider it just like that, there has to be a port maintainer. The port must obviously also be in good shape, but from looking at the source in config/calmrisc16/, it hasn't been touched since April 2001. I doubt it would even work with recent GCC snapshots. Gr. Steven ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support 2004-09-17 13:44 ` Steven Bosscher @ 2004-09-17 13:46 ` Richard Earnshaw 2004-09-17 14:01 ` Joern Rennecke 2004-09-17 14:16 ` Jeffrey A Law 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2004-09-17 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Steven Bosscher; +Cc: Udo van den Heuvel, gcc On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 13:51, Steven Bosscher wrote: > On Sep 17, 2004 02:37 PM, Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > Please consider incorporating the CalmRISC support to the current GCC. > > That would be up to someone who wants to contribute the port and > take responsibility for maintaining it. And it's original authors have to be prepared to assign the copyright... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support 2004-09-17 13:46 ` Richard Earnshaw @ 2004-09-17 14:01 ` Joern Rennecke 2004-09-17 14:10 ` Richard Earnshaw 2004-09-17 14:16 ` Jeffrey A Law 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Joern Rennecke @ 2004-09-17 14:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Earnshaw; +Cc: Steven Bosscher, Udo van den Heuvel, gcc > On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 13:51, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > On Sep 17, 2004 02:37 PM, Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > Please consider incorporating the CalmRISC support to the current GCC. > > > > That would be up to someone who wants to contribute the port and > > take responsibility for maintaining it. > > And it's original authors have to be prepared to assign the copyright... No, that would be RedHat, as the Copyright holder, unless they already assigned the Copyright to the FSF. I did the CalmRISC16 port as a RedHat employee. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support 2004-09-17 14:01 ` Joern Rennecke @ 2004-09-17 14:10 ` Richard Earnshaw 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Richard Earnshaw @ 2004-09-17 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Joern Rennecke; +Cc: Steven Bosscher, Udo van den Heuvel, gcc On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 14:25, Joern Rennecke wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 13:51, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > On Sep 17, 2004 02:37 PM, Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > > Please consider incorporating the CalmRISC support to the current GCC. > > > > > > That would be up to someone who wants to contribute the port and > > > take responsibility for maintaining it. > > > > And it's original authors have to be prepared to assign the copyright... > > No, that would be RedHat, as the Copyright holder, unless they already > assigned the Copyright to the FSF. I did the CalmRISC16 port as a RedHat > employee. Indeed. I should probably have used the word 'owner'. I'd be surprised if RedHat would have a problem with such an assignment, but it may depend on the nature of the contract that was undertaken to do the work. R. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support 2004-09-17 13:46 ` Richard Earnshaw 2004-09-17 14:01 ` Joern Rennecke @ 2004-09-17 14:16 ` Jeffrey A Law 2004-09-17 14:45 ` Steven Bosscher 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Jeffrey A Law @ 2004-09-17 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Richard Earnshaw; +Cc: Steven Bosscher, Udo van den Heuvel, gcc On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 07:04, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 13:51, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > On Sep 17, 2004 02:37 PM, Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > Please consider incorporating the CalmRISC support to the current GCC. > > > > That would be up to someone who wants to contribute the port and > > take responsibility for maintaining it. > > And it's original authors have to be prepared to assign the copyright. It's very possible the original work was from Cygnus/Red Hat. We did ports to the CalmRISC chips a few years ago. It shouldn't be terribly hard to find that codebase. jeff ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Samsung CalmRISC16 support 2004-09-17 14:16 ` Jeffrey A Law @ 2004-09-17 14:45 ` Steven Bosscher 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Steven Bosscher @ 2004-09-17 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: law, Richard Earnshaw; +Cc: Udo van den Heuvel, gcc On Friday 17 September 2004 16:01, Jeffrey A Law wrote: > On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 07:04, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 13:51, Steven Bosscher wrote: > > > On Sep 17, 2004 02:37 PM, Udo van den Heuvel <udovdh@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > > Please consider incorporating the CalmRISC support to the current > > > > GCC. > > > > > > That would be up to someone who wants to contribute the port and > > > take responsibility for maintaining it. > > > > And it's original authors have to be prepared to assign the copyright. > > It's very possible the original work was from Cygnus/Red Hat. We > did ports to the CalmRISC chips a few years ago. It shouldn't be > terribly hard to find that codebase. The source pointed to by Udo has CYGNUS LOCAL markers in it, and the port has apparently not been touched since April/May 2001 (it claims to be a "GCC 2.97" (!) variant). So this *is* the Cygnus/ RedHat port. Gr. Steven ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-17 14:10 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <1095424330.1272.ezmlm@gcc.gnu.org> 2004-09-17 13:04 ` Samsung CalmRISC16 support Udo van den Heuvel 2004-09-17 13:22 ` Diego Novillo 2004-09-17 13:44 ` Steven Bosscher 2004-09-17 13:46 ` Richard Earnshaw 2004-09-17 14:01 ` Joern Rennecke 2004-09-17 14:10 ` Richard Earnshaw 2004-09-17 14:16 ` Jeffrey A Law 2004-09-17 14:45 ` Steven Bosscher
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).