From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18793 invoked by alias); 9 Nov 2009 14:46:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 18784 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Nov 2009 14:46:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (HELO mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr) (192.134.164.105) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:46:31 +0000 Received: from chercheurs2-236.saclay.inria.fr (HELO fgglaptop) ([193.55.250.236]) by mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 09 Nov 2009 15:46:27 +0100 From: "Grigori Fursin" To: "'Joern Rennecke'" Cc: , "'Zbigniew Chamski'" , "'Richard Guenther'" , "'Basile STARYNKEVITCH'" , "'Ian Lance Taylor'" , "'GCC Mailing List'" , "'Albert Cohen'" , "'Yuri Kashnikoff'" , "'Yuanjie Huang'" , "'Liang Peng'" , , "'Mircea Namolaru'" , "'Diego Novillo'" References: <4AE6E471.4020200@starynkevitch.net> <84fc9c000910270518s147e0cc4t7f1cd53049c5d590@mail.gmail.com> <4AE6E5D0.4010401@starynkevitch.net> <4AE7014A.1000903@starynkevitch.net> <4AE70C5E.4050005@starynkevitch.net> <84fc9c000910270839v2d9efe0dw829c8647f361c96f@mail.gmail.com> <4AE7164D.9010200@starynkevitch.net> <84fc9c000910270855w736df367qe511d8db280aaeb4@mail.gmail.com> <2dc303d60910271056h17038110ib63c53cfa374f5c7@mail.gmail.com> <002c01ca5746$9dd43da0$d97cb8e0$@fursin@inria.fr> <20091102074959.p8410ulv28sg0w44-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <008601ca5e09$93164fb0$b942ef10$@fursin@inria.fr> <20091106121424.ph6anlgbk0848sss-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <01e701ca5f0d$903386f0$b09a94d0$@fursin@inria.fr> <20091106132953.s84iph9egwso8oo8-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <01ed01ca5f11$27f6d110$77e47330$@fursin@inria.fr> <20091108204326.rmzkdcuj48s0o4cg-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> In-Reply-To: <20091108204326.rmzkdcuj48s0o4cg-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> Subject: RE: [plugins-ici-cloning-instrumentation] new GCC plugin developements Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 14:46:00 -0000 Message-ID: <002a01ca614b$64b893e0$2e29bba0$@fursin@inria.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2009-11/txt/msg00249.txt.bz2 > After checking in the patch to provide unique pass names for all passes, > I created >=20 > svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/ici-20091108-branch >=20 > and merged in the patches from: >=20 > http://gcc-ici.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/gcc-ici/branches/patch-gcc-4.4= .0-ici-2.0 By the way, not to forget - we should compile/test GCC with ICI with the fo= llowing libraries (orthogonal to ICI but we need them for our experiments): * gmp & mpfr (for fortran) * ppl & cloog (for GRAPHITE) i.e. I configure GCC with the following flags: configure --enable-languages=3Dc,c++,fortran --with-mpfr=3D$BUILD_DIR --wit= h-gmp=3D$BUILD_DIR --with-ppl=3D$BUILD_DIR --with-cloog=3D$BUILD_DIR I used it for the GCC 4.4.0 - maybe some GRAPHITE related flags changed ... The idea is to have the same setup that we used for our local developments = ... Also, we have been using ICI with C and Fortran a lot, but never checked C+= + - it will be important to check it too ... Cheers, Grigori