From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-59541-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 19318 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2002 02:08:09 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 19311 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2002 02:08:08 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO fed1mtao02.cox.net) (68.6.19.243)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 3 Sep 2002 02:08:08 -0000
Received: from cx554943a ([68.8.168.90]) by fed1mtao02.cox.net
          (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with SMTP
          id <20020903020807.JRYE1374.fed1mtao02.cox.net@cx554943a>
          for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>; Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:08:07 -0400
Message-ID: <005901c252ee$f25695d0$5aa80844@fed1.sdca.home.com>
From: "Mike Laman" <mlaman@cox.net>
To: "GCC" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <002f01c24f89$6ad6efa0$0a00000a@zarquin><20020830044008.A479336@murlibobo.cs.mu.OZ.AU><001e01c24fe4$f4b6e580$5aa80844@fed1.sdca.home.com><20020901160425.GA13739@ceres.cs.mu.oz.au><001901c251f4$5cd6db50$5aa80844@fed1.sdca.home.com><000501c251f5$8ad6b740$5aa80844@fed1.sdca.home.com> <87it1o60dn.fsf@sibyl.beware.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: __main
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 19:08:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-SW-Source: 2002-09/txt/msg00051.txt.bz2

Hi Ian,

I'd really like to call main "main". The more conforming, the better.
The less exceptions/restrictions/issues/problems/features the better.

Thanks,
Mike
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ian Dall" <ian@beware.dropbear.id.au>
To: "Mike Laman" <mlaman@cox.net>
Cc: "GCC" <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 5:29 AM
Subject: Re: __main


> "Mike Laman" <mlaman@cox.net> writes:
> 
> > I tried it. I still get the __main call.
> > 
> > Any other ideas?
> 
> Do you need to call your main "main"?
> 
> Ian
>