public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: "Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr@cs.tamu.edu>,
	"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: attribute data structure rewrite
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 02:34:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <006d01c4a1dd$ffc60b70$dc4e2a97@bagio> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3vfe4pk6k.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu>

Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:

> Currently, the compiler fails on any of the following fails,
> complaining about  non-"integral constant expression"-ness, which is
> pure nonense.
> 
>     const int N = 4;
>     struct S {
>       enum { M = 4 };
>       float x __attibute__((__aligned__(N)));
>       float x __attibute__((__aligned__(M)));
>     };
> 
>    template<typename T, int N>
>       struct buffer {
>          typedef char U[sizeof(T)];
>          U data __attribute__((__aligned__(N)));
>      };

Is there already a bug report about this?

Anothing thing I have been shown today is that we currently reject this:

----------------------------------------
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdio.h>

struct A { char foo[10]; };

void bar(void) {
    int i;
    for (i=0;i<10;i++)
        printf("%d\n", offsetof(struct A, foo[i]));
}
--------------------------------------

but we used to accept it.  Any idea about its legality? Workarounds?

Giovanni Bajo


  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-24  2:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-24  0:15 Geoffrey Keating
2004-09-24  0:34 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-09-24  1:30   ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-24  1:47   ` Zack Weinberg
2004-09-24  6:52   ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-09-24  1:40 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-24  2:34   ` Giovanni Bajo [this message]
2004-09-24  2:59     ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-24  4:17       ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-09-24  4:18         ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-24  8:40     ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-24  8:40       ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-24  9:17     ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-24 14:45       ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-09-24  8:36   ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-09-24 14:03     ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-24  2:35 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-09-24  8:33   ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-09-24 12:24     ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-09-24 22:29 ` Mark Mitchell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='006d01c4a1dd$ffc60b70$dc4e2a97@bagio' \
    --to=giovannibajo@libero.it \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gdr@cs.tamu.edu \
    --cc=jsm28@cam.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).