From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3400 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2004 19:40:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3232 invoked from network); 1 Mar 2004 19:39:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mailstore-1.mail.knowledge.com) (213.170.2.69) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 19:39:59 -0000 Received: from [213.253.17.15] (helo=sonylaptop) by mailstore-1.mail.knowledge.com with asmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1AxtGf-0004Zg-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:39:57 +0000 Message-ID: <009801c3ffc4$fbcdb060$24e0a8c0@sonylaptop> From: "Peter Galbavy" To: "Theo de Raadt" , "Andreas Jaeger" Cc: "Gabriel Dos Reis" , "Daniel Jacobowitz" , "Andrew Pinski" , , "Marc Espie" , References: <200403010359.i213xcqp005885@cvs.openbsd.org> Subject: Re: gcc and compiling speed Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:40:00 -0000 Organization: Knowtion Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-03/txt/msg00079.txt.bz2 Andreas Jaeger wrote: > much slower together with the numbers. Since we do not have access to > OpenBSD, we need that file self contained, meaning preprocessed with Cough. ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/ Peter