From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: "Gabriel Dos Reis" <gdr@cs.tamu.edu>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: attribute data structure rewrite
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 04:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00cf01c4a1e0$bf25faa0$dc4e2a97@bagio> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3zn3go0mj.fsf@merlin.cs.tamu.edu>
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> We used to accept it because we did not implement offsetof correctly.
> For example, the following variation should be rejected (in C89 an C++
> mode)
>
> struct A { char foo[10]; };
> void bar(void) {
> int i;
> for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
> {
> char ary[offsetof(struct A, foo[i] + 1);
> }
> }
I don't understand your example because I don't think the +1 there is valid.
Unless you meant:
char ary[offsetof(struct A, foo[i])+1];
Anyway, what about this in C99? We don't need a constant expression in this
context, and even if offsetof is always a constant expression we could still
accept it as an extension. In other words, we could transform it to
offsetof(struct A, foo)+i*sizeof(foo[0]) in contexts that don't require a
constant expression.
Giovanni Bajo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-24 2:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-24 0:15 Geoffrey Keating
2004-09-24 0:34 ` Andrew Pinski
2004-09-24 1:30 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-24 1:47 ` Zack Weinberg
2004-09-24 6:52 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-09-24 1:40 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-24 2:34 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-09-24 2:59 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-24 4:17 ` Giovanni Bajo [this message]
2004-09-24 4:18 ` Gabriel Dos Reis
2004-09-24 8:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-24 8:40 ` Andreas Schwab
2004-09-24 9:17 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-24 14:45 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-09-24 8:36 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-09-24 14:03 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-09-24 2:35 ` Giovanni Bajo
2004-09-24 8:33 ` Geoffrey Keating
2004-09-24 12:24 ` Nathan Sidwell
2004-09-24 22:29 ` Mark Mitchell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00cf01c4a1e0$bf25faa0$dc4e2a97@bagio' \
--to=giovannibajo@libero.it \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gdr@cs.tamu.edu \
--cc=jsm28@cam.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).