From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Olaf Petzold <opetzold@wit.regiocom.net>
To: GCC Mailing List <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: stl_relops.h collision conflict
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 04:57:00 -0000
Message-id: <01091113315100.02113@gatekeeper>
X-SW-Source: 2001-09/msg00406.html

Hello,

I'm writing an ET library. Unfortunally I'm gone into trouble
with the stl internal header stl_relops.h from gcc:

template <class _Tp>
inline bool operator>(const _Tp& __x, const _Tp& __y) {
  return __y < __x;
}

and my:

template<class T1, class T2, size_t Sz>
inline
Xpr<
  XprBinOp<
    VectorReference<T1, Sz>,
    Functional::Greater<T1, T2>,
    VectorReference<T2, Sz>
  >
>
operator>(const Vector<T1, Sz>& lhs, const Vector<T2, Sz>& rhs) {
  typedef XprBinOp<
    VectorReference<T1, Sz>,
    Functional::Greater<T1, T2>,
    VectorReference<T2, Sz>
    >                                                   expr_type;
  return Xpr<expr_type>(expr_type(lhs.ref(), rhs.ref()));
}

Is there no way to force the compiler to use my implementation of
operator>() ? 

On gcc-3.0.1 the relops header has an own inner namespace but, the problems
has been occoured in prior version as well. Is there a work around ?

Thanks
Olaf