From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25111 invoked by alias); 11 Dec 2001 21:29:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25086 invoked from network); 11 Dec 2001 21:29:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cdlsystems.com) (207.228.116.20) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 11 Dec 2001 21:29:31 -0000 Received: from hades by cdlsystems.com with SMTP (MDaemon.v3.5.3.R); Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:29:29 -0700 Message-ID: <013101c1828a$f2762010$160e10ac@hades> From: "Mark Cuss" To: Cc: References: <20011204153416.A24659@disaster.jaj.com><20011204155032.A24992@disaster.jaj.com><00d001c17d05$4be398c0$160e10ac@hades> <3C0D3A05.6FE3602F@redhat.com><00cc01c18271$ef4c12a0$160e10ac@hades><012001c18286$3ca8f9a0$160e10ac@hades> Subject: Re: Embedded Assembly and MMX in GCC Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 14:09:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-Return-Path: mcuss@cdlsystems.com Reply-To: mcuss@cdlsystems.com X-SW-Source: 2001-12/txt/msg00613.txt.bz2 Ok, I will ask my question there - thanks! Mark ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexandre Oliva" To: Cc: ; Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:12 PM Subject: Re: Embedded Assembly and MMX in GCC > On Dec 11, 2001, "Mark Cuss" wrote: > > > If I put two %'s in front of mm0, the assembler returns "bad register name > > `%%mm0` " > > > With the one %, it says "suffix or operands invalid for `movq`" > > > It seems that on an inline statement, I need to put only 1 % in front of reg > > names if there are no input or output variables, and 2 %'s if there are... > > Ah, yes, indeed! I had mis-read your report. If the message comes > from the assembler, then it seems to be the case that the assembler > doesn't support the opcode you're using, or it expects it to be > written in a different way. In either case, the GCC mailing list is > not the best place to discuss assembler issues: the binutils mailing > list is (as long as you're using GNU as :-). > > -- > Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ > Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} > CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} > Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me > >