From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26288 invoked by alias); 7 Mar 2003 13:33:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26279 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2003 13:33:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.goquest.com) (12.18.108.6) by 172.16.49.205 with SMTP; 7 Mar 2003 13:33:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 4540 invoked by uid 0); 7 Mar 2003 13:33:12 -0000 Received: from mszick@goquest.com by mail.goquest.com by uid 502 with qmail-scanner-1.15 (spamassassin: 2.31. Clear:. Processed in 0.74707 secs); 07 Mar 2003 13:33:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO wolf466) (66.90.208.113) by mail.goquest.com with SMTP; 7 Mar 2003 13:33:11 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Michael S. Zick Reply-To: mszick@goquest.com To: Lars Segerlund , Biagio Lucini Subject: Re: Suggestions for improving gcc 3.2 compilation speed? Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 14:07:00 -0000 Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <3E5E99B5.8000705@maad.com> <3E6881C3.2030405@comsys.se> In-Reply-To: <3E6881C3.2030405@comsys.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <03030707323200.01006@wolf466> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2003-03/txt/msg00503.txt.bz2 On Friday 07 March 2003 05:25 am, Lars Segerlund wrote: > I have a small idea, once upon a time people were using kilo lines per > second as a measurement of compiler speed, and on a 68030 you could hit > well above 10klps optimized code. > > Perhaps we could report this metric ? Hmm... Once upon a time programs didn't use a zillion templates from a STL. But if the count could be broken down into: Source Lines: Included Lines: Lines read: Expanded lines out: Template Include Lines: Or some other subdivisions that would account for the different processing paths of programs being compiled, it might be an interesting number to report (-fline-counts?) Mike