From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-x102e.google.com (mail-pj1-x102e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98C233856DF5 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:25:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 98C233856DF5 Received: by mail-pj1-x102e.google.com with SMTP id t11-20020a17090ad50b00b001d95bf21996so8020609pju.2 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:25:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0dGu+jkbS+/Xw25mo0CgmyN5FdakutJrnSgqaoX42y0=; b=lOfQUeQ0Q4h1eKfmmLrNK3gyg1Nuinl4YjqHObj7XpsLE9G4wsa5d0y1mAVYOBnz14 bkr6m+vR9QflGS24QPn5RfSf6SHYFtZS6WWgAkFWlJUwzSVMRru2zu1ObnY7+TACyWil +H1F6ML3GruwBMFYp6179q2Eg2pxCje/i9kENXLZxBMds4+Vnxg0NkZnM5YoS4tCFhC1 j//3TqQ/N0YbaH/W3R++87sYIqwffTUMQ7ASxAQNAlPYdKoBaU7qC0pl9KdFYMFpkV+J 95CwHXVM/kLOCkuKrCBQISkuNdcYtr/bDotP4D3tAt3njAK/cVK/Kw14nVQqri41HEDh YjAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533S3m3AG5NufQvyd/PqxDTXzhQku3e/mrns74CChI5zx3nSoy9B zuGMxmawphjXW5N+jFcCcm/BFjaKhR8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwtH3Eil13aXtEevo4tNoVx0FaXP2SKhzgIvxkW4imDlnZCgYHNtUPGsVi2SJrI0WbNVR2eOQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1d07:b0:1db:e9a2:89c with SMTP id on7-20020a17090b1d0700b001dbe9a2089cmr1963050pjb.102.1651159545032; Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:25:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.31.0.204] (c-73-63-24-84.hsd1.ut.comcast.net. [73.63.24.84]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s190-20020a625ec7000000b005061c17c111sm222140pfb.71.2022.04.28.08.25.44 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Apr 2022 08:25:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <03810fc0-b807-86f1-b72b-0a3502cb3eff@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 09:25:43 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: GCC 12.0.1 Status Report (2022-04-28) Content-Language: en-US To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: From: Jeff Law In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gcc@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 15:25:48 -0000 On 4/28/2022 8:59 AM, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote: > Status > ====== > > We have reached zero P1 regressions today and releases/gcc-12 branch has > been created. GCC 12.1-rc1 will be built likely tomorrow. > The branch is now frozen for blocking regressions and documentation > fixes only, all changes to the branch require a RM approval now. > > If no show stoppers appear, we'd like to release 12.1 late next week, > or soon after that, if any important issues are discovered and > fixed, rc2 could be released next week. Do you want me to adjust the testsuite so that we handle the new linker warnings for executable stacks better?  The situation now isn't ideal in that we're showing spurious regressions if we use the development binutils bits. My pending change backs out my change to gcc.dg/lto/pr04157_0.c and instead prunes the new warnings out in prune.exp.  I was waiting on validation of a couple targets in my tester which completed yesterday. Jeff