From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C353858D28 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 11:41:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org B0C353858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F64D75; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.2.78.54] (e120077-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.2.78.54]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB00A3F5A1; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:41:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <04681986-a556-4520-152c-c4957c21db87@arm.com> Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 12:41:32 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.0 Subject: Re: Cauldron schedule: diagnostics and security features talks Content-Language: en-GB To: Siddhesh Poyarekar , GCC References: <7db530ee-6769-5ee5-5512-1e84701a940a@gotplt.org> From: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" In-Reply-To: <7db530ee-6769-5ee5-5512-1e84701a940a@gotplt.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3493.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KAM_DMARC_NONE,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,KAM_SHORT,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 08/09/2023 19:18, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > Hello, > > I want to begin by apologizing because I know from first hand experience that scheduling can be an immensely painful job. > > The Cauldron 2023 schedule[1] looks packed and I noticed that Qing and David's talks on security features and diagnostics respectively are in the same time slot.  Both those sessions are likely to have pretty big overlaps in audience IMO since the topics are thematically related.  Is there a way in which they could be put in different time slots? > > IIRC they were in different time slots before and were probably moved around to cater for another conflict (hence maybe making it harder to move them again) but I figured I'd rather air my request and be turned down than have to make the difficult choice :) > > Thanks! > Sid > > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/cauldron2023 This has been pointed out privately as well. I'll have one more go at juggling the order, but you're right, this has been the most painful part of the organising so far. R.