From: "Stefan Kanthak" <stefan.kanthak@nexgo.de>
To: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Suboptimal code generated for __buitlin_ceil on AMD64 without SS4_4.1
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2021 09:31:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0532D36E954348E28A2B22812297A5F2@H270> (raw)
Hi,
targeting AMD64 alias x86_64 with -O3, GCC 10.2.0 generates the
following code (17 instructions using 78 bytes, plus 6 quadwords
using 48 bytes) for __builtin_ceil() when -msse4.1 is NOT given:
.text
0: f2 0f 10 15 10 00 00 00 movsd .LC1(%rip), %xmm2
4: R_X86_64_PC32 .rdata
8: f2 0f 10 25 00 00 00 00 movsd .LC0(%rip), %xmm4
c: R_X86_64_PC32 .rdata
10: 66 0f 28 d8 movapd %xmm0, %xmm3
14: 66 0f 28 c8 movapd %xmm0, %xmm1
18: 66 0f 54 da andpd %xmm2, %xmm3
1c: 66 0f 2e e3 ucomisd %xmm3, %xmm4
20: 76 2b jbe 4d <_ceil+0x4d>
22: f2 48 0f 2c c0 cvttsd2si %xmm0, %rax
27: 66 0f ef db pxor %xmm3, %xmm3
2b: f2 0f 10 25 20 00 00 00 movsd 0x20(%rip), %xmm4
2f: R_X86_64_PC32 .rdata
33: 66 0f 55 d1 andnpd %xmm1, %xmm2
37: f2 48 0f 2a d8 cvtsi2sd %rax, %xmm3
3c: f2 0f c2 c3 06 cmpnlesd %xmm3, %xmm0
41: 66 0f 54 c4 andpd %xmm4, %xmm0
45: f2 0f 58 c3 addsd %xmm3, %xmm0
49: 66 0f 56 c2 orpd %xmm2, %xmm0
4d: c3 retq
.rdata
.align 8
0: 00 00 00 00 .LC0: .quad 0x1.0p52
00 00 30 43
00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00
.align 16
10: ff ff ff ff .LC1: .quad ~(-0.0)
ff ff ff 7f
18: 00 00 00 00 .quad 0.0
00 00 00 00
.align 8
20: 00 00 00 00 .LC2: .quad 0x1.0p0
00 00 f0 3f
00 00 00 00
00 00 00 00
.end
JFTR: in the best case, the memory accesses cost several cycles,
while in the worst case they yield a page fault!
Properly optimized, faster and shorter code, using just 15 instructions
in 65 bytes, WITHOUT superfluous constants, thus avoiding costly memory
accesses and saving at least 32 bytes, follows:
.intel_syntax
.equ BIAS, 1023
.text
0: f2 48 0f 2c c0 cvttsd2si rax, xmm0 # rax = trunc(argument)
5: 48 f7 d8 neg rax
# jz .L0 # argument zero?
8: 70 36 jo .L0 # argument indefinite?
# argument overflows 64-bit integer?
a: 48 f7 d8 neg rax
d: f2 48 0f 2a c8 cvtsi2sd xmm1, rax # xmm1 = trunc(argument)
12: 48 a1 00 00 00 mov rax, BIAS << 52
19: 00 00 00 f0 3f
1c: 66 48 0f 6e d0 movq xmm2, rax # xmm2 = 0x1.0p0
21: f2 0f 10 d8 movsd xmm3, xmm0 # xmm3 = argument
25: f2 0f c2 d9 02 cmplesd xmm3, xmm1 # xmm3 = (argument <= trunc(argument)) ? ~0L : 0L
2a: 66 0f 55 da andnpd xmm3, xmm2 # xmm3 = (argument <= trunc(argument)) ? 0.0 : 1.0
2e: f2 0f 58 d9 addsd xmm3, xmm1 # xmm3 = (argument > trunc(argument)) ? 1.0 : 0.0
# + trunc(argument)
# = ceil(argument)
32: 66 0f 73 d0 3f psrlq xmm0, 63
37: 66 0f 73 f0 3f psllq xmm0, 63 # xmm0 = (argument & -0.0) ? -0.0 : 0.0
3c: 66 0f 56 c3 orpd xmm0, xmm3 # xmm0 = ceil(argument)
40: c3 .L0: ret
.end
regards
Stefan
next reply other threads:[~2021-08-05 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-05 7:31 Stefan Kanthak [this message]
2021-08-05 7:41 ` Hongtao Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0532D36E954348E28A2B22812297A5F2@H270 \
--to=stefan.kanthak@nexgo.de \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).