From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B0373858D28 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2022 18:38:08 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7B0373858D28 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=inria.fr Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=inria.fr DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=inria.fr; s=dc; h=date:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+5JbKqPlqjlVjaCKu0ogJ4HburVtncp/9OEwkvS2h8w=; b=qOR85iGmeVZNSYeKMAwmpLG0bwBGGUn1lxE/3n0H9iteeHmllSM/h3PQ KiOg2GagB+B9BWRmW+ex1p5JZQTE2gFeQnotTEywSo5HDQki0gI3iAo7C BXYmUGNXX9oEDJE/sopsCWQy5R1GNmCK1PBEN4CuEJD76EtCSKWY4adSU Y=; Authentication-Results: mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=SoftFail smtp.mailfrom=marc.glisse@inria.fr; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) d=inria.fr X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.95,205,1661810400"; d="scan'208";a="67883765" Received: from 85-171-187-240.rev.numericable.fr (HELO hippo) ([85.171.187.240]) by mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Oct 2022 20:38:05 +0200 Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2022 20:38:05 +0200 (CEST) From: Marc Glisse Reply-To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org To: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?P=E9ntek_Imre?= cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: clarification question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <05af051f-deb4-ea6c-19aa-bce5207513bc@inria.fr> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Sat, 22 Oct 2022, Péntek Imre via Gcc wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/backends.html > > by "Architecture does not have a single condition code register" do you mean > it has none or do you mean it has multiple? Either. If you look at the examples below, there is a C for riscv, which has 0, and one for sparc, which has several. -- Marc Glisse