From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-105601-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 16221 invoked by alias); 23 Nov 2004 02:31:21 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 15810 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 02:30:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO develer.com) (151.38.19.110)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 02:30:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 27487 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2004 02:30:48 -0000
Received: from mimas.trilan (HELO mimas) (10.3.3.245)
  by ns.trilan with SMTP; 23 Nov 2004 02:30:48 -0000
Message-ID: <06d401c4d104$7124ad80$f503030a@mimas>
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <rasky@develer.com>
To: "Mark Mitchell" <mark@codesourcery.com>
Cc: <mrs@apple.com>,
	<gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <200411230026.iAN0QqeO005220@sirius.codesourcery.com> <884E869E-56B9-43AD-ACDD-0F2A47287087@apple.com> <41A29C79.5070803@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 03:00:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00794.txt.bz2

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:

>> Dear Santa, for Christmas I want a regression tester that will
>> specifically find the person that caused each of the 200 regressions,
>> then do: sort | uniq -c | sort -nr and update a web page with that
>> information.  We can then have just the people that put in regressions
>> get hammered instead of everyone.
>
> Yes, that would be nice. :-)


The closer I get is this:

~$ wget -q -O - http://snurl.com/regressions40csv | cut -d ',' -f 5 | sort |
uniq -c | sort -nr
    166 "unassigned@gcc.gnu.org"
      7 "mark@codesourcery.com"
      6 "rth@gcc.gnu.org"
      6 "pinskia@gcc.gnu.org"
      6 "giovannibajo@libero.it"
      4 "rakdver@gcc.gnu.org"
      3 "lerdsuwa@gcc.gnu.org"
      2 "zack@gcc.gnu.org"
      2 "nathan@gcc.gnu.org"
      2 "hjl@lucon.org"
      2 "dberlin@gcc.gnu.org"
      2 "bje@gcc.gnu.org"
      1 "zlaski@apple.com"
      1 "zack@codesourcery.com"
      1 "uros@kss-loka.si"
      1 "toon@moene.indiv.nluug.nl"
      1 "steven@gcc.gnu.org"
      1 "jason@redhat.com"
      1 "hubicka@gcc.gnu.org"
      1 "echristo@redhat.com"
      1 "ebotcazou@gcc.gnu.org"
      1 "drow@gcc.gnu.org"
      1 "dnovillo@redhat.com"
      1 "dnovillo@gcc.gnu.org"
      1 "bonzini@gcc.gnu.org"
      1 "bkoz@gcc.gnu.org"
      1 "assigned_to"
      1 "aaronavay62@aaronwl.com"


Then, we need a policy to auto-assign a regression to whoever caused/exposed
it, and you'd get your Santa present for Thanksgiving :)
-- 
Giovanni Bajo