From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-201720-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 49553 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2020 19:58:37 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 49543 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jan 2020 19:58:37 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=squashed, H*i:sk:3qsoxQ@, H*MI:sk:3qsoxQ@, H*f:sk:3qsoxQ@
X-HELO: mx2.suse.de
Received: from mx2.suse.de (HELO mx2.suse.de) (195.135.220.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jan 2020 19:58:27 +0000
Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254])	by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8DEAD48;	Tue, 21 Jan 2020 19:58:24 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: git: remote: *** The first line of a commit message should be a short description of the change, not a single word.
To: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@gmail.com>, Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Cc: "Richard Earnshaw (lists)" <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@acm.org>, GCC Development <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
References: <ca530e15-5157-3f17-9c97-10d99a63a193@suse.cz> <CAH6eHdRad1wHeok6=DLh+B8HMGdi-s=o5wsqcKTTaMV67TDXhw@mail.gmail.com> <a0dcfd85-4bd4-09a4-98f0-bc3ceedec8a4@arm.com> <dcc3ebdb-9806-2658-cf9d-07997a7abe07@acm.org> <211156b2-7ec2-3dd5-5e6f-6c72af59c4ad@arm.com> <CADzB+2k9Hei0hc+e-sa2Lmb5jknyozoHqXRqJh7LNmTyaGyFwg@mail.gmail.com> <CAH6eHdTPKGXMBLEGpzUwTgPpepBVcRT64kxqadNac=c=3qsoxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Li=c5=a1ka?= <mliska@suse.cz>
Message-ID: <0a2868f4-608c-85a7-b7e7-cdf86873da0a@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:26:00 -0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAH6eHdTPKGXMBLEGpzUwTgPpepBVcRT64kxqadNac=c=3qsoxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-IsSubscribed: yes
X-SW-Source: 2020-01/txt/msg00390.txt.bz2

On 1/21/20 6:30 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Whether they make it to trunk or not doesn't really change the fact
> that a one-word message is poor. If it's only on your local machine,
> do what you like. The hook only complains when such a commit is
> published on gcc.gnu.org.

I would disagree here. I used 'WIP' as my commit message for a branch
that is an experimental and potentially fixes a PR. GCC git is a central
point for my setup, I need to push the branch in order to pull it from
a different machine and test it there.

Moreover, as Jason said, one can have multiple commits that will be
squashed anyway before a patch submission.

Martin