From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-return-106259-listarch-gcc=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 27309 invoked by alias); 4 Dec 2004 15:19:48 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/>
Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 27219 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2004 15:19:40 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO develer.com) (151.38.19.110)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 4 Dec 2004 15:19:40 -0000
Received: (qmail 12794 invoked from network); 4 Dec 2004 15:19:27 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mimas) (10.3.3.245)
  by ns.trilan with SMTP; 4 Dec 2004 15:19:27 -0000
Message-ID: <0af601c4da14$a47293f0$f503030a@mimas>
From: "Giovanni Bajo" <rasky@develer.com>
To: "Ernest L. Williams Jr." <ernesto@ornl.gov>
Cc: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <1102169587.3660.27.camel@lion>
Subject: Re: tree_list not supported by dump_type (Historical Question)
Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2004 15:19:00 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-SW-Source: 2004-12/txt/msg00221.txt.bz2

Ernest L. Williams Jr. <ernesto@ornl.gov> wrote:

> Did this fix survive in gcc-3.X.X?   Was this considered a compiler and
> later as GCC became more
> ISO C++ compliant the patch was removed?   Any help in understanding is
> appreciated.

Do you have a testcase?
-- 
Giovanni Bajo