From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17208 invoked by alias); 24 Nov 2004 18:19:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16797 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 18:18:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO develer.com) (151.38.19.110) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 18:18:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 21874 invoked from network); 24 Nov 2004 18:18:35 -0000 Received: from mimas.trilan (HELO mimas) (10.3.2.250) by ns.trilan with SMTP; 24 Nov 2004 18:18:35 -0000 Message-ID: <0cbe01c4d252$03240520$f503030a@mimas> From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: "Mike Stump" Cc: "Janis Johnson" , "Mark Mitchell" , References: <200411230026.iAN0QqeO005220@sirius.codesourcery.com> <884E869E-56B9-43AD-ACDD-0F2A47287087@apple.com> <41A29C79.5070803@codesourcery.com> <20041123170139.GA4463@us.ibm.com> <095801c4d180$19e95e40$f503030a@mimas> Subject: Re: Mainline in regression-fix mode after Thanksgiving Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:44:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00912.txt.bz2 Mike Stump wrote: > I would like to arguing in favor of setting a policy in which we > automagically assign people the regressions they cause. Great, another one for this. > So, let me ask if anyone who puts in patches would object to having > regressions assigned to them? If no one objects, I'd say, lets just > make it policy. Any takers? It is totally fine with me as well, and it is in fact what I already do: I immediately assign regressions which I caused to me, so that I don't lose track of them. -- Giovanni Bajo