From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31716 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2004 01:06:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31487 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2004 01:05:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO smtp0.libero.it) (193.70.192.33) by sourceware.org with SMTP; 18 Nov 2004 01:05:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (172.16.1.83) by smtp0.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 40D2BD60021F9E40; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:05:52 +0100 Received: from [151.41.184.47] (151.41.184.47) by smtp3.libero.it (7.0.027-DD01) id 4178F0D300DEAF7A; Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:05:52 +0100 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.0.289 [265.3.1]); Thu, 18 Nov 2004 02:07:59 +0100 Message-ID: <0e2a01c4cd0b$0b8e3560$2fb82997@bagio> From: "Giovanni Bajo" To: "Mark Mitchell" Cc: References: <442C1616-387F-11D9-9815-0030654C2998@hamburg.de> <419BF0D6.40008@codesourcery.com> Subject: Re: Is ObjC++ still in time for 4.0? Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 01:18:00 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at libero.it serv4 X-SW-Source: 2004-11/txt/msg00600.txt.bz2 Mark Mitchell wrote: > No, but only because we're seeing enough other problems. I've tried > twice in the last week to put together a status report, but I keep > getting overwhelmed by the current state of Bugzilla. I really will > get to that soon, I promise. I would still like to see this happen > for 4.0. Anything bugmasters can do to ease your work, just ask. Giovanni Bajo