public inbox for gcc@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* rs6000 NON_SPECIAL_REGS
@ 2001-12-16 19:55 Aldy Hernandez
  2001-12-16 20:04 ` David Edelsohn
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aldy Hernandez @ 2001-12-16 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Edelsohn; +Cc: gcc external

is there a reason why NON_SPECIAL_REGS is not the exact bit opposite of
SPECIAL_REGS?

  { 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0x00000008, 0x00000000 }, /* NON_SPECIAL_REGS */ \

  { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000007, 0x00000000 }, /* SPECIAL_REGS */     \

aldy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: rs6000 NON_SPECIAL_REGS
  2001-12-16 19:55 rs6000 NON_SPECIAL_REGS Aldy Hernandez
@ 2001-12-16 20:04 ` David Edelsohn
  2001-12-16 21:59   ` Aldy Hernandez
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Edelsohn @ 2001-12-16 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Aldy Hernandez; +Cc: gcc external

>>>>> Aldy Hernandez writes:

Aldy> is there a reason why NON_SPECIAL_REGS is not the exact bit opposite of
Aldy> SPECIAL_REGS?

Aldy> { 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0x00000008, 0x00000000 }, /* NON_SPECIAL_REGS */ \

Aldy> { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000007, 0x00000000 }, /* SPECIAL_REGS */     \

	Because the name is not accurate?  It really is the union of
GENERAL_REGS and FLOAT_REGS.

David

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: rs6000 NON_SPECIAL_REGS
  2001-12-16 20:04 ` David Edelsohn
@ 2001-12-16 21:59   ` Aldy Hernandez
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aldy Hernandez @ 2001-12-16 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Edelsohn; +Cc: gcc external

On Sun, 2001-12-16 at 19:55, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >>>>> Aldy Hernandez writes:
> 
> Aldy> is there a reason why NON_SPECIAL_REGS is not the exact bit opposite of
> Aldy> SPECIAL_REGS?
> 
> Aldy> { 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0x00000008, 0x00000000 }, /* NON_SPECIAL_REGS */ \
> 
> Aldy> { 0x00000000, 0x00000000, 0x00000007, 0x00000000 }, /* SPECIAL_REGS */     \
> 
> 	Because the name is not accurate?  It really is the union of
> GENERAL_REGS and FLOAT_REGS.

ahh, that explains my float failures when i "fix" non_special_regs.

thx
> 
> David
-- 
Aldy Hernandez			E-mail: aldyh@redhat.com
Professional Gypsy
Red Hat, Inc.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-12-17  4:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-12-16 19:55 rs6000 NON_SPECIAL_REGS Aldy Hernandez
2001-12-16 20:04 ` David Edelsohn
2001-12-16 21:59   ` Aldy Hernandez

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).